Seit Plum vor kurzem eine Umstrukturierung im Team ankündigte, hat sich viel getan. Support-Tickets, welche teilweise ein knappes Jahr vor sich hingammelten wurden aufgeräumt und geschlossen. Hierbei dürfte es sich aber mehr um eine Schadensbegrenzung handeln, um die Zeit bis zur durchschnittlichen Behebung eines Problems nicht unnütz in die Höhe schnellen zu lassen. An sich ganz okay, allerdings scheint dieser Wahn alle Threads zu schließen sich jetzt auf das KmdT auszuweiten. Ich werde in diesem Artikel weder Namen nennen, noch Andeutungen machen, welche auf Namen schließen lassen um die Vertraulichkeit des KmdT nicht zu verletzen. Allerdings finde ich es an der Zeit, dass gezeigt wird, welche Tendenz momentan im ach so integren Team vorherrscht.
Hier wirkt es vor allem so, dass sobald unangenehme Fragen auftauchen, wie z.B. das alte Problem mit den 3 Torplaneten, simply the thread with a short comment "we care about is already" closed. It is remarkable here is that "care" about such problems since the first invasion of an inactive Torplaneten is. That this is a bug is clear, the end with the zeroing of the planet must surely be clear or? Every database developer I would also agree that this is in a reasonably structured database in a matter of minutes and with a reasonable front end a few seconds. In addition here would also consider whether there is an intent on the part exploited bug, after all, is so clearly described in the rules that only gates in other universes may be present and not on his own. Furthermore
spreads further and further the fact that data has been transferred from the KmdT the Immortals, which in the last naive players that their talks with the team until now still held to be confidential, caused great dismay. Also had some team members (played or not can not be answered clearly) very negative surprise. A
I reported, clearly put out, for example, multi suddenly, after his name appeared in KmdT. A request to check later on Multitum concluded by saying that this would be nothing but happy and I appreciate sollte, dass ein Multi aus dem Spiel raus ist. Danach wurde auch dieser Thread gecloset.
Soll ich mich in so einem Fall glücklich schätzen? Glücklich, dass ein weiterer Spieler mit einem Regelverstoß einfach so davongekommen ist, während andere dafür aus dem Spiel ausgeschlossen werden? Das wage ich doch arg zu bezweifeln.
Eine weitere Meldung im KmdT, diesmal in Bezug auf beleidigende Planetennamen wurde kurzerhand dadurch "bestraft", indem der Planet auf dem die schlimmste Beleidigung stand umbenannt wurde in *Zensiert*. Alle andern Planeten behielten ihre Namen und der Spieler wurde nicht in einen unfreiwilligen Urlaub geschickt. Auch hier wurde keine Chance auf Einspruch gelassen und der Thread sofort gecloset. Sehr fair compared to other players, the one-hand curled already for far less insulting violations penalties of up to 3 days.
The second largest hammer was, however, in my view, although the fact that the team in terms of indicating that they are entitled to "extremely conspicuous Accounts at any time without cause to terminate, however, this right never exercised. For example, when players who have not developed their planet for months (sometimes even 0 points), since scan months and also give other general information for months, no sign of being out of a maximum of just yellow and then reactivated as if by magic from him. However, even these irregularities are simply the Note gecloset that it would be easier if he would admit the Multi is a multi. If we play the welfare and take the multi-hunters from even their work?
And now we come to the absolute peak. A message where a player openly admitted that someone else knows his login information was referred to as "usual Flame". We remember, I of § 6 Conditions:
This proves once again one thing quite clear. It surely is not Plum, the team shall enjoy a bad reputation. This could only be changed by players in the team take effect, which are not "consider and decide," but keep in the punishment with the applicable rules.
Hier wirkt es vor allem so, dass sobald unangenehme Fragen auftauchen, wie z.B. das alte Problem mit den 3 Torplaneten, simply the thread with a short comment "we care about is already" closed. It is remarkable here is that "care" about such problems since the first invasion of an inactive Torplaneten is. That this is a bug is clear, the end with the zeroing of the planet must surely be clear or? Every database developer I would also agree that this is in a reasonably structured database in a matter of minutes and with a reasonable front end a few seconds. In addition here would also consider whether there is an intent on the part exploited bug, after all, is so clearly described in the rules that only gates in other universes may be present and not on his own. Furthermore
spreads further and further the fact that data has been transferred from the KmdT the Immortals, which in the last naive players that their talks with the team until now still held to be confidential, caused great dismay. Also had some team members (played or not can not be answered clearly) very negative surprise. A
I reported, clearly put out, for example, multi suddenly, after his name appeared in KmdT. A request to check later on Multitum concluded by saying that this would be nothing but happy and I appreciate sollte, dass ein Multi aus dem Spiel raus ist. Danach wurde auch dieser Thread gecloset.
Soll ich mich in so einem Fall glücklich schätzen? Glücklich, dass ein weiterer Spieler mit einem Regelverstoß einfach so davongekommen ist, während andere dafür aus dem Spiel ausgeschlossen werden? Das wage ich doch arg zu bezweifeln.
Eine weitere Meldung im KmdT, diesmal in Bezug auf beleidigende Planetennamen wurde kurzerhand dadurch "bestraft", indem der Planet auf dem die schlimmste Beleidigung stand umbenannt wurde in *Zensiert*. Alle andern Planeten behielten ihre Namen und der Spieler wurde nicht in einen unfreiwilligen Urlaub geschickt. Auch hier wurde keine Chance auf Einspruch gelassen und der Thread sofort gecloset. Sehr fair compared to other players, the one-hand curled already for far less insulting violations penalties of up to 3 days.
The second largest hammer was, however, in my view, although the fact that the team in terms of indicating that they are entitled to "extremely conspicuous Accounts at any time without cause to terminate, however, this right never exercised. For example, when players who have not developed their planet for months (sometimes even 0 points), since scan months and also give other general information for months, no sign of being out of a maximum of just yellow and then reactivated as if by magic from him. However, even these irregularities are simply the Note gecloset that it would be easier if he would admit the Multi is a multi. If we play the welfare and take the multi-hunters from even their work?
And now we come to the absolute peak. A message where a player openly admitted that someone else knows his login information was referred to as "usual Flame". We remember, I of § 6 Conditions:
may exist only one account per player. The password can not be passed. Additionally the "moral" (eg vacation) of accounts banned - these are specifically a holiday mode.adoption side, I would write that I let myself be immoral by someone, I would be normally locked within an hour by a moderator, I'd probably even impossible, and the basis of this famous, already mentioned above suspicion clause.
This proves once again one thing quite clear. It surely is not Plum, the team shall enjoy a bad reputation. This could only be changed by players in the team take effect, which are not "consider and decide," but keep in the punishment with the applicable rules.
0 comments:
Post a Comment