Murder charge
Hiermit klagt BlaggBlogg die Administration von fo rum ten eriffa.de wegen Mord an einen Thread, in Tateinheit mit schwerster Körperverletzung an der Meinungsfreiheit an.
Wie uns so eben mehrere Informanten mitteilten wurde der Thread zum Thema Grundeinkommen nach 300 Posts und über 5000 Klicks kommentarlos gelöscht.
Mutmaßlich Indeed, the lack of reflectivity committed. Tolerance and a sense of freedom, associated with the sensitivity of the perpetrators seem strange.
reads the indictment as follows:
Prosecutor:
Prosecutor
International BLAGGBLOGG Court
blogosphere
I. indictment
in the criminal case against
the Internet portal: fo rum Tene riffa.de
The BLAGGBLOGGanwaltschaft shall, on the basis of their investigations the accused following facts to load:
During the evening, on 25 March 2009, the administrative powers of the Internetprotals with the URL: http://www.fo around Tene riffa.de an innocent thread that the opinion was in cold blood, by deleting murdered.
was deliberately and intentionally limited the right to freedom of expression, as well as a defacto ban on dissenting views by another request thread deletions issued fake moderate.
Given the scope and the public interest is in the mail from a specific gravity of the act. Objections to the perpetrators had acted according to house rules can not be invoked because the thread was for the time remaining, scale and also a lack of standard terms of violations regarding the offender is known and he has given conclusive action by the Right to remain in the forum. A deletion within the meaning of the rights of the home is present when a subject is immediately removed with a reference to the premises. Any violations of individual had against the terms and conditions can be solved taking into account the proportionality were different, but also by conclusive action as wanted provided with an approval.
The special public interest in prosecution is in the affirmative.
The accused is alleged, therefore, to have
intentionally running a very serious infringement of freedom of expression and against the ethics on the Internet by abuse of power.
essential result of the investigation:
The thread was first mutilated and then killed.
to the trial of the International Court of Justice BLAGGBLOGG
blogosphere is responsible.
I apply
a) the charges for trial before the International Court of Justice BLAGGBLOGG
blogosphere - Criminal Division - to allow
b) continued monitoring of the forums
c) to order the accused a defense lawyer, he should not appoint his own.
d) convene a trial date,
As evidence, I call:
first Witnesses are in the witness protection program, the statements are sworn before
second Experts: independent regulatory bodies
to the International Court of Justice BLAGGBLOGG
blogosphere
blogosphere, the 26 March 2009
the Prosecutor
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Took Primolut Tablet Too Late And Period Started
T innocent?
Recently, one wonders once more: Is the team voluntarily? Or is it the team with some players the other player simply much, much rather have? You can check it ultimately does not, you do not know yet who is behind this mysterious Simpsons aliases such as Roy and Scratchy. Especially in a war with this arbitrariness denounced quite strange flowers. This gave the player Joooly (D ~ B) 5 penalty points for being tried by a faked attack on a fleet of the enemy that to move to the attack to stop. When that did not respond, Joooly broke off and saved his ship.
far, so good, probably thinking no sane player would mark Earth Lost in such an action and the sounds penalty call, the owner of the affected fleet apparently belonged to this category. He reported the action but the team and is unresponsive. Penalty points for an action (namely Fakeatts) which was at RoastChicken (ALK) 2 weeks earlier from the same host (ie Roy) dismissed as compliant, since you are at war is irrelevant. His decision in this case, he even decorated with the phrase, "Please come only when no There is war or a situation which was also started by you ', we parse this sentence.
Point 1: There was also the case in Jooolys still war
Point 2: The action was begun here by the person concerned (after all, he was so, the first attacked, finally Joooly can conjure up yet and only catch flying fleets)
asked Nevertheless Joooly Roy: "[...] not compare apples with pears" Here you must be Roy right since the attacks of Joooly were in no way comparable to that RoastChicken. Roast was repeatedly attacked during an invasion fleet with mini (1 KeMz) obviously to be SMS account to this title. Joooly however, tried during an attack by a player that instill a shock. Since normally during such action by the attacker with the butt on a chair near a computer is located, in which he had with the disabled probably on that very computer mouse, the existing small checkbox "Notification of attack via text message," could Joooly assume that this same player he no worldly possessions with steals the cash money paid credits.
By now everyone should be clear that Jooolys attacks far from the quality of the nerve and Fakeangriffe of RoastChickens opponents reached. But as if it were not already confusing enough then why only Joooly is punished, a second moderator that still stirs KmdT. Scratchy says here saying: "[...] You have started against several people and Atts Seconds later called back. This has nothing to do with SMS, there are pure Fakeatts "
But that's not enough. Almost desperately Scratchy still tries to justify the decision. So he moves in front of a statement that recalled the attacker Roasts case, only a few vertimte Cleanerflotten and again tried to Timing. All possible good, but who it was, you know that the ships ... äääh correction ... that the ship, which was called "Cleanerflotte" vertimet "," would have been never to use it as such.
doubt Joooly Understandably at this audacity of the team on its objectivity, what he hears from Scratchy he was "cheeky". As Joooly ultimately even the claim stellt, dass er für gemeldete Aktionen in Zukunft die selbe Bestrafung erwartet, wird ihm von Roy zum Abschluss Folgendes entgegengeschleudert:
„Du kannst gar nichts aber auch wirklich gar nichts erwarten. Wir wägen ab und entscheiden.
MfG
Close“
Erneute Analyse:
Punkt 1: Bedeutet „Du kannst nichts […] erwarten“, dass man beim Team nie genau weiß wie es entscheiden wird? Ist es der reinen unendlichen Willkür des Teams überlassen ob ein Spieler für eine anscheinend regelwidrige oder in diesem Fall laut Roy sogar regelkonforme Aktion penalized?
Point 2: "We're balanced and decide" What decision as a moderator? What weight they put on the scales? According to Roy, the team wisely has not given as many penalty points on Joooly that this ends up in the U-mode is not to intervene in the war. Here one could now raise up many theories, why was the case of RoastChickens attacker acted differently:
- Existing penalty points to attacker for an immediate closure would have resulted, and thus an intervention in the war?
- deeds silently watching, although in one case did Jooolys silently watching was denied? Because according to terms of § 6, paragraph VIII, it is not allowed to send multiple fleets in short intervals on a planet and is punishable by expulsion from the game.
- .... etc. pp.
Who are the mysterious players who call themselves a moderator? And perhaps the most important question: Who is Roy? Is he a member of the at war with the ALX and D ~ B are alliances be? Or is he just a sympathizer just that? Or maybe just the bad Baby with one eyebrow, has the Joooly in his childhood in the sandbox always cut the heart-shaped baking pan on your head? Finding out we will probably never before, but this situation clearly shows once again why the moderators alias . Who Because of such actions, they deserve my opinion, not just a few light blows to the back of the head to stimulate the mind again.
Recently, one wonders once more: Is the team voluntarily? Or is it the team with some players the other player simply much, much rather have? You can check it ultimately does not, you do not know yet who is behind this mysterious Simpsons aliases such as Roy and Scratchy. Especially in a war with this arbitrariness denounced quite strange flowers. This gave the player Joooly (D ~ B) 5 penalty points for being tried by a faked attack on a fleet of the enemy that to move to the attack to stop. When that did not respond, Joooly broke off and saved his ship.
far, so good, probably thinking no sane player would mark Earth Lost in such an action and the sounds penalty call, the owner of the affected fleet apparently belonged to this category. He reported the action but the team and is unresponsive. Penalty points for an action (namely Fakeatts) which was at RoastChicken (ALK) 2 weeks earlier from the same host (ie Roy) dismissed as compliant, since you are at war is irrelevant. His decision in this case, he even decorated with the phrase, "Please come only when no There is war or a situation which was also started by you ', we parse this sentence.
Point 1: There was also the case in Jooolys still war
Point 2: The action was begun here by the person concerned (after all, he was so, the first attacked, finally Joooly can conjure up yet and only catch flying fleets)
asked Nevertheless Joooly Roy: "[...] not compare apples with pears" Here you must be Roy right since the attacks of Joooly were in no way comparable to that RoastChicken. Roast was repeatedly attacked during an invasion fleet with mini (1 KeMz) obviously to be SMS account to this title. Joooly however, tried during an attack by a player that instill a shock. Since normally during such action by the attacker with the butt on a chair near a computer is located, in which he had with the disabled probably on that very computer mouse, the existing small checkbox "Notification of attack via text message," could Joooly assume that this same player he no worldly possessions with steals the cash money paid credits.
By now everyone should be clear that Jooolys attacks far from the quality of the nerve and Fakeangriffe of RoastChickens opponents reached. But as if it were not already confusing enough then why only Joooly is punished, a second moderator that still stirs KmdT. Scratchy says here saying: "[...] You have started against several people and Atts Seconds later called back. This has nothing to do with SMS, there are pure Fakeatts "
Here is my opinion, an analysis of needs. Is it only allows Fakeatts carried out under the condition that the respondent has SMS alert and the attacker tries to knowingly the SMS account on empty? You are punished if the opponent does not have an SMS alert, or one does not try hard enough to consume his credits?
doubt Joooly Understandably at this audacity of the team on its objectivity, what he hears from Scratchy he was "cheeky". As Joooly ultimately even the claim stellt, dass er für gemeldete Aktionen in Zukunft die selbe Bestrafung erwartet, wird ihm von Roy zum Abschluss Folgendes entgegengeschleudert:
„Du kannst gar nichts aber auch wirklich gar nichts erwarten. Wir wägen ab und entscheiden.
MfG
Close“
Erneute Analyse:
Punkt 1: Bedeutet „Du kannst nichts […] erwarten“, dass man beim Team nie genau weiß wie es entscheiden wird? Ist es der reinen unendlichen Willkür des Teams überlassen ob ein Spieler für eine anscheinend regelwidrige oder in diesem Fall laut Roy sogar regelkonforme Aktion penalized?
Point 2: "We're balanced and decide" What decision as a moderator? What weight they put on the scales? According to Roy, the team wisely has not given as many penalty points on Joooly that this ends up in the U-mode is not to intervene in the war. Here one could now raise up many theories, why was the case of RoastChickens attacker acted differently:
- Existing penalty points to attacker for an immediate closure would have resulted, and thus an intervention in the war?
- deeds silently watching, although in one case did Jooolys silently watching was denied? Because according to terms of § 6, paragraph VIII, it is not allowed to send multiple fleets in short intervals on a planet and is punishable by expulsion from the game.
- .... etc. pp.
Who are the mysterious players who call themselves a moderator? And perhaps the most important question: Who is Roy? Is he a member of the at war with the ALX and D ~ B are alliances be? Or is he just a sympathizer just that? Or maybe just the bad Baby with one eyebrow, has the Joooly in his childhood in the sandbox always cut the heart-shaped baking pan on your head? Finding out we will probably never before, but this situation clearly shows once again why the moderators alias . Who Because of such actions, they deserve my opinion, not just a few light blows to the back of the head to stimulate the mind again.
Monday, March 23, 2009
Center Post For Diaper Cake Layers
first use in processing
A reconstruction of the thread "D4U - Germany for YOU - and how you think about " a high priority.
As we were told there exists an absolute arbitrariness in the deletion of posts. A little could we understand this, at the first evaluation, with all the facts, the picture is somewhat clearer.
To illustrate a few examples:
This post was deleted:
Post time Unknown reconstructed by post in the thread.
This post was deleted:
Post time reconstructed by unknown Posted by Gus Meyr in the thread.
These are two of the posts that were previously reconstructed using tracks in thread. Which demonstrates the clear on-topic was deleted.
However, what has stopped shows that this is no accident, but happened to political expediency and the limits of censorship here starts to work.
standing remained so ingenious statements like:
Faro 09.03.2009, 15:44
Liza 13.03.2009, 12:01
again Liza 13.03.2009, 12:39
Gus Myers 13.03.2009, 08:59
Whether there has been proceeded against only one user, or whether this was just luck that it has cited other TBD.
This has been censored here, but politics is clear.
We fo rum Tene riffa.de ask
- ontopic produce the passages again, by means of backup available to any commercial forum. to remove the insulting and inhumane passages Lichen -
.
- to take a position on the possible membership of moderators to right-wing parties
Everyone can contribute to the clarification requested further material will be made available.
Otherwise, you can soon Write on Main
Largest deutschtummelnde censorship forum Tenerife reference
As of Tagoror TV was previously reported , we have to resolved an investigation of the operations in the largest German in his own words Tenerife forum in order for Tene riffa.de launch.
A reconstruction of the thread "D4U - Germany for YOU - and how you think about " a high priority.
As we were told there exists an absolute arbitrariness in the deletion of posts. A little could we understand this, at the first evaluation, with all the facts, the picture is somewhat clearer.
To illustrate a few examples:
This post was deleted:
Post time Unknown reconstructed by post in the thread.
Copyright: scchh
CIS, the think the remedy is not thought far enough. It is within the existing structures in any way. New jobs bring anything, it must be ensured that people can live (on the capacity and resources does it even worldwide).
So everything is there and yet people starve to death, where is the mistake?
eliminate this error, you can leave a lot of room for the things the world really needs.
And it does not need five stages of selling chips that made the leap in development in a. She needs no bulbs are manipulated so that they kolabieren after a certain number. Even ball bearings are designed so that they are not out after a certain number of hours. Technically possible is what is different.
chips could be detected immediately built to the highest power (just install no jumpers for manipulation), light bulbs could hold up to 7 times longer with the effiktivsten processing. Ball bearings can normally hold up the object around it and is unusable. Diee list is only a Bruchtteil.
Why is not done? Claro - this reduces the profit.
Is it useful? Economically - certainly intended Ecological and for the people? - Whole, definitely not. It costs resources of this world and the money of the people unnecessarily.
But the tenor is rather let people suffer, as the sacred cow of profit to question time.
This post was deleted:
Post time reconstructed by unknown Posted by Gus Meyr in the thread.
Quote:
| Capitalism is not dead and is not even in death, this crisis is by design and will once again provide capital to where mes (after belongs to some), and to whom it is taken in the States to bankruptcy. And who is the state? That's right, those who live in it. cool system? As you pay 10.000 € per citizen to the banks and the economy can continue to make their bonuses. |
Quote:
| I am an advocate of what is technically possible, if there are pure Fully automated production processes is be nice, but not to the conditions that prevail at present. Today, this means what can be great for people to live suffering, hunger, unemployment, disability. >> THIS CAN NOT BE << |
However, what has stopped shows that this is no accident, but happened to political expediency and the limits of censorship here starts to work.
standing remained so ingenious statements like:
Faro 09.03.2009, 15:44
hola, my suggestion would be built, another mauer,und sperrtund solche
alle die für diesen vorangestellten vorschlag sind hinter diese .
es grenzt ja schon an geistiger verarmung diesen vorschlag auch nur im entferntesten anzunehmen.für jeden müßte doch klar sein, daß diese sozialistischen vorschläge der vergangenheit angehören sollte.
dieser geistige dünnschiss spukt in den köpfen derer ,die selbst nichts auf die reihe bekommen.es läßt sich leichter leben auf kosten der allgemeinheit.
hätte es in der ddr funktioniert,wäre sie heute noch existent.
selber verantwortung für sich zu übernehmen-dafür muß man lernfähig
und auch willig sein.
muchos saludos![]()
Liza 13.03.2009, 12:01
Is that in Africa, also ?????????????![]()
again Liza 13.03.2009, 12:39
but next door, the growAnd now an example where the quoted text is deleted, but the spam could remain as to what course in the reconstruction hilft![]()
!
love greetings love Santana![]()
.
encoder but come to the the Northern Lights on ............. strange ideas.
Ville Maybe we live peacefully? Efficient? (We are on the pulse of the time)
Or they can simply not understand us more or we do not (they shores of smile).
Gus Myers 13.03.2009, 08:59
Na it works!Zitat:
Und der Ansatz mit der erhöhten Verbrauchssteuer erscheint mir auch sehr Systemimanent - es gibt da durchaus interessantere Ansätze. Und wenn gar die CDU die Idee verfolgt bleibe ich erst recht wachsam, die stehen wie auch andere Parteien für ein weiter so im Herrschaftssystem.
Ich lehne jede Form der Herrschaft ab, egal ob Diktatorisch oder Pseudodemokratisch.![]()
wolf teat ends, otters noses
way is raging in this Thread the Judean People's Front against the People's Front of Judea!
Ultimately we all want only one thing (no, not what everyone thinks), a living with and among each other!
Whether there has been proceeded against only one user, or whether this was just luck that it has cited other TBD.
This has been censored here, but politics is clear.
We fo rum Tene riffa.de ask
- ontopic produce the passages again, by means of backup available to any commercial forum. to remove the insulting and inhumane passages Lichen -
.
- to take a position on the possible membership of moderators to right-wing parties
Everyone can contribute to the clarification requested further material will be made available.
Otherwise, you can soon Write on Main
Largest deutschtummelnde censorship forum Tenerife reference
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Removing Cigarette Lighter Ford Focus
Anonymous Register and surf in forums.
means at user locks it again and again register with a new IP .
For IP-blocking helps browsing through proxies here, a service provider that is easy and safe.
It also helps to maintain his privacy.
Torproject
is very nice and helpful. Who has done with other services with their experience can tell that you.
means at user locks it again and again register with a new IP .
For IP-blocking helps browsing through proxies here, a service provider that is easy and safe.
It also helps to maintain his privacy.
Torproject
is very nice and helpful. Who has done with other services with their experience can tell that you.
Friday, March 20, 2009
Bushnell Binoculars Driver
References
Here is the list of literature references to the article, published in the RESCUE 04/2009:
[1] R. Adams Cowley 1917-1991 [R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center - Baltimore, MA (USA)]
[2] J. Sampalis et al (1993) Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care 34:252-261
[3] trauma registry of the DGU - Annual Report 2004
[4] F. Wagner, K. Baumgart (2007 ) Shock - non-clinical aspects. Emergency and Rescue Medicine 8:593-605
[5] H. Lier (2008) Hypothermia and the deadly triad. Emergency and Rescue Medicine 11:377-380
[6] I. Roberts et al (2004) Colloids vs. Crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD000567
[7] A. Timmermann et al, (2007) The out-of-hospital esophageal and endobronchial intubation performed by emergency physicians. Anesth Analg 104:619-623
[8] M. Eckstein et al, (2000) Effect of prehospital advanced life support on outcomes in major trauma patients. J Trauma 48:643-648
[9] JW Ufberg et al (2005) Aspiration of gastric contents: association with prehospital intubation. Am J Emerg Med 23:379-382
[10] C. Byhahn, V. Dörges (2007) Preclinical intubation. Emergency and Rescue Medicine 10:482-487
[11] W. Zink et al, (2002) INTECH-study group: Invasive emergency techniques (INTECH). 51:853-862
anesthesiologist [12] C. Waydhas et al, (2003) Ltd. Emergency Medicine at the DGU chest trauma and chest drain: diagnosis and therapy - A systematic review, part 1 Emergency Medical & Rescue 6:541-548
[13] MJ Seamon et al, (2007) Prehospital procedures before ED thoracotomy "scoop and run" save lives. J Trauma 63:113-120
[14] IG Stiell et al, (2008) The OPALS Major Trauma Study: Impact advanced life support on survival and morbidity. Canadian Medical Association Journal 178 (9) :1141-1152
[2] J. Sampalis et al (1993) Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care 34:252-261
[3] trauma registry of the DGU - Annual Report 2004
[4] F. Wagner, K. Baumgart (2007 ) Shock - non-clinical aspects. Emergency and Rescue Medicine 8:593-605
[5] H. Lier (2008) Hypothermia and the deadly triad. Emergency and Rescue Medicine 11:377-380
[6] I. Roberts et al (2004) Colloids vs. Crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD000567
[7] A. Timmermann et al, (2007) The out-of-hospital esophageal and endobronchial intubation performed by emergency physicians. Anesth Analg 104:619-623
[8] M. Eckstein et al, (2000) Effect of prehospital advanced life support on outcomes in major trauma patients. J Trauma 48:643-648
[9] JW Ufberg et al (2005) Aspiration of gastric contents: association with prehospital intubation. Am J Emerg Med 23:379-382
[10] C. Byhahn, V. Dörges (2007) Preclinical intubation. Emergency and Rescue Medicine 10:482-487
[11] W. Zink et al, (2002) INTECH-study group: Invasive emergency techniques (INTECH). 51:853-862
anesthesiologist [12] C. Waydhas et al, (2003) Ltd. Emergency Medicine at the DGU chest trauma and chest drain: diagnosis and therapy - A systematic review, part 1 Emergency Medical & Rescue 6:541-548
[13] MJ Seamon et al, (2007) Prehospital procedures before ED thoracotomy "scoop and run" save lives. J Trauma 63:113-120
[14] IG Stiell et al, (2008) The OPALS Major Trauma Study: Impact advanced life support on survival and morbidity. Canadian Medical Association Journal 178 (9) :1141-1152
[15] B Roudsari et al, (2007) Emergency medical service systems in developed and developing countrys. Injury 38:1001-1013
have Home Remedies To Speed Process Of Vitiligo
purpose of this blog
This blog was created to attacks by the moderators and admins of the forums to document the world and organize a gemeinsamnes action against the enemy, restrictions which hinder, violating the right to freedom of expression.
action against spam, trolls, and users who take in inhuman manner, we will not express. It only deals with deletions closures, etc to mind control.
menschverachtliche We do not support views, since they certainly can be an opinion, but leads to a restriction of freedom of expression.
This site is online and inquiries are very welcome. Some organizational issues are resolved at the time now. Stay tune - Everything will be fine.
This blog was created to attacks by the moderators and admins of the forums to document the world and organize a gemeinsamnes action against the enemy, restrictions which hinder, violating the right to freedom of expression.
action against spam, trolls, and users who take in inhuman manner, we will not express. It only deals with deletions closures, etc to mind control.
menschverachtliche We do not support views, since they certainly can be an opinion, but leads to a restriction of freedom of expression.
This site is online and inquiries are very welcome. Some organizational issues are resolved at the time now. Stay tune - Everything will be fine.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
How Often Shower A Schanuzer
Case
"You are with your ambulance in a traffic accident, because of the message screen you have been sent as a single life-saving equipment, see the following situation.
04-2009 In the issue of the journal rescue service, we as an input to the article "Advanced vs.. basic measures in the prehospital care severely injured" on the pros and cons of extended Measures in severely injured trauma patients following case study published
"You are with your ambulance in a traffic accident, because of the message screen you have been sent as a single life-saving equipment, see the following situation.
A car is from the lane ready to come and to a tree crashed into the driver was of first responders rescued from the car and now stands beside the vehicle more patients do not exist you get through the initial investigation, the following findings:.. male
patient, 50 years, free airway, breathing accelerated, but sufficient, (120/min), tachycardia radial pulse, moderate palpable, pallor, GCS 9, Pupillen seitengleich, Druckschmerz-reaktion li. Thorax, Atemgeräusch li. leicht abgeschwächt, Abwehrspannung im Abdomen.
Sie befinden sich ca. 3 km vom nächsten Schwerpunktkrankenhaus entfernt, der dort stationierte Notarzt befindet sich im Einsatz und der nächste freie Notarzt hätte eine Anfahrtszeit von ca. 14 Minuten."
Uns würde Ihr Vorgehen in dieser Situation sowie evtl. die Hintergedanken zu Ihrem Vorgehen interessieren. Auch Ihre eigenen Erfahrungen bzgl. der Traumaversorgung in Ihrem Rettungsdienstbereich sowie Kommentare zu diesem Thema sind gewünscht.
Also... schreiben Sie uns Ihre Meinung als Kommentar zu diesem Post. Wir werden versuchen auf all substantive comments with another post to respond and get's so perhaps a very interesting and instructive "round" in response to this issue.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)